Proposed changes to the planning system announced by the Government are very troubling and overly focused on unachievable housing targets, says Richmond Council.

Earlier this year the Government published two key consultations: one on proposed changes to the current planning system, and the other on a much more radical reform of the way the planning system works in England.

In its response to the consultation on the proposed changes to the existing system, the Council has raised concerns that the plans are overly focused on housing matters at the expense of other pressing issues such as the climate emergency, sustainable economic growth, the natural environment and the future of our town centres.

Councillor Julia Neden-Watts, Chair of the Environment and Sustainability Committee at Richmond Council, set out some of the issues:

"These deeply troubling proposals would have a severe impact on our borough and its residents.

"The Government's "housing algorithm" worryingly suggests that Richmond must deliver 2,000-odd new homes per year – against a current target of 441 homes. But where and how exactly are these homes to be built?

"Delivery of affordable housing is a priority locally, but the Government has already made this difficult under the current planning system, and the proposed changes will exacerbate the problem.

"Much of Richmond's housing supply comes from smaller sites – proposals to scrap affordable housing contributions from smaller developments will therefore further reduce our ability to deliver homes people can afford.

"We have a duty to deliver the housing that our borough needs. The pandemic has very starkly emphasised the contrast between those living in flats with limited access to outside space and those living in more roomy accommodation with gardens and the ability to adapt to home working.

"But, with a weaker system of control, we could end up with poorly designed and too densely developed areas and still fail to address the significant need for low-cost rental housing in our communities.

"This is a missed opportunity to improve matters, and